Capture one styles vs lightroom presets1/29/2024 In fact, making Gen.2 of these was hard because they were already good. I do extensive homework for every film I make. Film presets should be made with extensive testing to work well. All these examples were done with the presets, which means camera type is not a barrier. But if you look at these examples you can see how each has its own character. While Classic Negative has an almost soft color look, classic Chrome is a bit brighter and more slide film-like, even though it’s not actually that close to the Kodachrome film it was inspired by.īoth produce great results and both can feel very natural. I talked about that in this video.Ĭlassic Chrome – is soft and gentle and sometimes you may need a bit more if your light is not contrasty. Loosely based on Superia 200 and Classic Chrome is very loosely based on Kodachrome. Turn up the exposure a little on portraits to make it smoother. It’s well-loved for streets for that reason, though usually, it’s not my favorite for portraits. It has subdued colors but is more contrasty. Classic Chrome Like, RAW File with preset Classic Negative Like, RAW file with preset A Classic Negative vs Classic Chrome Profile ReviewĬlassic Negative – is a bit deeper and more intense. If you own FIlmist Complete, this is a free update, and you can get your account for the latest install. You can also download the Filmist sampler again for the 1.8 version. The updated version includes the Lightroom Presets, the Capture One Styles, and the video LUTS. All these looks come thanks to many test images from the long hours, so they are more accurate than ever. I’ll write more about that in another post. Everything comes from my newly updated V1.8 and nearly world-famous “like” versions of these recipes as presets for any camera.ġ.8 also has the new Gen 2 of the Ektar 100 which is a really great film. In today’s post, I’ll share a variety of photos processed with these Capture One and Lightroom Film presets. Filmist 1.8 brings better C1 and Lightroom Film Presets! PS: If you want to create your own Classic Chrome preset for free, you can watch the video I made on the Gen 1 recipe here to get a good starting point. Plus you can use filmic presets on any camera or even video thanks to LUTS. I nearly always apply the looks with a preset and not a baked-in look because it gives more control. I also love Fuji cameras and they have great profiles like Classic Chrome. This looks was especially hard to re-create on RAW, but now that I have it I can use it on files from any camera. The JPEG Classic Chrom from my Fuji V100V next to the RAW file processed with the presets only. It helps you gain perspective on every other process because film will always have an organic look. Things that were once boring become atmospheric and feel more real. But the film does something magical for digital. Presets like PowerFlow and Natural HDR and great. But the hardest to create are my Capture One and Lightroom film presets, Filmist. I’ve been making master preset packs since Lightroom launched. 2 versions of my Classic negative-like and Classic Chrom-like presets, as well as Ektar Gen2 ( I made a post about that here) With nearly 5 years of development, Filmist has become a king of great filmic presets, and I’m super proud of it. I just finished Filmist V1.8 with new Gen. The Gen.2 Classic Negative Like presets have been refined a lot since my first version a few years ago giving you the JPEG-like colors with the RAW advantages in post. The problem is they only work on some cameras Filmic presets are the solution. That’s because they create their camera profiles from Film. It seems Fuji is the only camera maker who has managed to make its in-camera profiles iconic. Classic Negative and Classic Chrome are two very popular color profiles on Fuji cameras.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |